The writ petition was heard at the stage of admission. The petitioners were permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedies in law. The petition was dismissed accordingly.
Permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedies in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1911 OF 2010
Shri Bhagwat S/o Ganpat Bhangale& Oths. .... PETITIONERS V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Oths.
.... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.K.Kadam, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 12/04/2010
PER COURT :
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE
knp/ WP 1911.10
2
Shri Bhagwat S/o Ganpat Bhangale & Oths.
The State of Maharashtra & Oths.
P.V.Hardas
S.V.Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
