This PIL was allowed to be withdrawn. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION 149 OF 2009
| Manish R. Sawla | ... | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Vs. | ||
| State of Maharahtra | ... | Respondents |
Mr. Abhay Pande, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K.Jadhav, AGP for Respndent Nos. 1 & 5.
Mr. G.D.Utangale i/b. Utangale & Co.,Advocates for respondent No.2.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 7th January, 2010.
P.C.
On account of formal defect, the learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file fresh petition. The Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(J.H.BHATIA,J.)
(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Manish R. Sawla
State of Maharashtra
F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhattia
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
