In a PIL, the petitioner appearing in person sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION 146 OF 2009
Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashta & Anr. ... Respndents
Mr. Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar, petitioner in person. Mr. D.A.Nalawade, Govt. Pleader for the State – Respndent No.1.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 7th January, 2010.
P.C.
The party appearing in person seeks leave to withdraw this Petition
with liberty to file fresh petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(J.H.BHATIA,J.)
Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar
The State of Maharashta
F.I.REBELLO
J.H.BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
