appeal in its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. In any case as to which place is more suitable is the question to be looked into by the authorities. We do not possess expertise to go into the said question. We do not find that the Additional Chief Secretary while taking a decision in the present petition has acted malafidely or irrationally. The petition is therefore without any merit and as such dismissed. 6. At this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an order of statusquo for a period of six weeks. On a query put by us to the learned counsel, he states that the site which has chosen by the Addl. Chief Secretary is in the same village and is at a distance of two and half km. away from the site whee the petitioners want the centre to be constructed. We find that the present petitioner, instead of having the Primary Health centre which is to be established for the benefit of residents of seven villages, are more interested in litigating before this court and the Apex Court. We find that any order of statusquo would unnecessary stall the project which is necessary in the interest of residents at large in those villages. As such we are not inclined to grant the said prayer. The same is therefore rejected.
