COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
Petitioner to pay costs quantified at Rs. 25,000 to Respondent No. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mgn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PIL PETITION NO. 32 OF 2008
The B.E.S.T. Workers Union .Petitioners
Vs.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Vishal Bodhe i/b. P.M. Patil for petitioner. Mrs. S.Ajit Kumar for respondent No.1.
Mr. S.K. Talsania, Senior Counsel with Ms. Kavita Anchan i/b. M.V. Kini & Co., for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. R.J. Mane, AGP for respondent No.5.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 14TH JANUARY, 2010
P.C.
The matter was on board last week. Request was made to adjourn the matter as the Counsel was not available. The matter was on board again today. Once again the adjournment is sought on the ground that the Counsel was not well and had to leave the Court.
the petition is nothing but an outcome of actions taken by the management in which
the petitioners were not directly affected.
(J.H. BHATIA, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
The B.E.S.T. Workers Union
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
