Mahendra J.Vora v. B.M.C. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Notice of Motion for restoration of the petition disposed of in favour of petitioner with order made absolute; petition listed for further proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Notice of Motion allowed and made absolute; Petition listed for hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 114 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 166 OF 1997
Mahendra Jadhavji Vora ...Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Shailesh Shah i/by M/s. Khona & Kayser for the Petitioner Ms. V.S. Gharpure for the Respondent/MCGM.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ . DATE: MARCH 26, 2010
P.C.:-
This a Notice of Motion for restoration of the petition.
- For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Motion, we are inclined to allow the Notice of Motion. The Notice of
Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The petition be listed for hearing on the Weekly Board, along with
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahendra Jadhavji Vora
- respondent
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Coram
J.N. Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S. Rehab Pranay Developers and 2 Ors. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors.
Vidyashankar Tripathi Vs Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking
Kala Uttam Jain Vs the Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.
M/S.Orchid Buildcon Private Limited Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.