Petition stood disposed of as petitioners consented to terms via Minutes of order submitted by one of the parties. No substantive legal question was decided.
Disposal of the writ petition in terms of consent minutes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.539 OF 2010
M/s. Rehab Pranay Developers & Ors.
..Petitioners
Vs.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
..Respondents
Ms. Ferzana Behramkamdin i/b FZB & Associates for Petitioners Mr. S. C. Naidu a/w Mr. Shambhuraje i/b India Law alliance for Respondent No.6 Ms. V. S. Gharpure for Respondent No.1
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A.P. BHANGALE, JJ
DATE : 25th March, 2010.
P.C. :
petitioners and respondent No.6. Rest of the respondents are connected with Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The petitioners are directed to furnish copy of the Minutes of order to the Learned Counsel for rest of the respondents. Petitioners to remain present at 3.00 p.m.
No.3, and Mr. Amit Thakkar representing Respondent No.6, identified
by their respective Counsel, are present before the Court. They
admitted that they have signed the Consent Terms after understanding the contents thereof. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Petitioners do not press for any relief against the rest of the Respondents.
M/s. Rehab Pranay Developers & Ors.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
J. N. PATEL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
