Automatic Electric Ltd. v. Kapsales Electricals Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a company petition where the petitioner was absent for multiple hearings, leading to the order's closure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
COMPANY PETITION NO. 899 OF 2001.
M/s. Automatic Electric Ltd. ..Petitioner.
v/s.
M/s. Kapsales Electricals Ltd. ..Respondent.
None for Petitioner. None for Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010.
P.C.
In the above Petition, none has appeared for the Petitioner on 23rd April 2009, 6th August 2009, 12th November 2009, 10th June 2010 and 16th September 2010. In view thereof,
the Company Petition was directed to be placed today for dismissal. However, even today no one appears for the Petitioner.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
M/s. Automatic Electric Ltd.
M/s. Kapsales Electricals Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court