The High Court of Bombay disposed of Arbitration Application No. 36 of 2010 based on consent terms signed by the advocates for both parties, which were taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ARBAP36-12.10
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2010
Biotor Industries Ltd. and others
..Applicants.
Vs.
Tata Capital Ltd.
..Respondent.
.....
Mr. Niranjan Pandit with Mr.P.M. Kapadia i/b Joy Legal Consultants for the Applicants.
Mr. D.D. Madon, Senior Advocate i/b Wadia Gandhy & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
12 October 2010 .
P.C . :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the
Respondent have placed on the record Consent Terms signed by the advocates for the parties. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as X‘ ’. The Arbitration Application is disposed of in terms thereof.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
Biotor Industries Ltd. and others
Tata Capital Ltd.
DR D Y CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
