The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of the Arbitration Application. The court noted the parties' agreement to refer disputes to arbitration under Clause 22 of their 2007 contract. The application was dismissed after certain allegations were withdrawn.
Arbitration Application disposed of; allegations in para 13 not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ARBAP40-8.10
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2010
Bhupendra D. Goradia ..Applicant.
Vs.
M/s.Alfa-e-solutions Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Ms. Preeti F. Rathod for the Applicant.
Mr. Viraj Maniar i/b M/s. Viraj Maniar & Associates for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
8 October 2010.
P.C . :
At the hearing of the Arbitration Application, counsel
appearing on behalf of the Applicant and counsel appearing on behalf
of the Respondent are agreed that in terms of Clause 22 of the agreement dated 28 December 2007, the disputes and differences between the parties may be referred to the arbitration of Mr. Markand
Gandhi under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In view of
the aforesaid agreement that has been arrived at between the parties,
2
ARBAP40-8.10
PNP
it is clarified on the request of the parties that the allegation
contained in paragraph 13 of the Arbitration Application has not been
pressed. The Arbitration Application is accordingly disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow arbitration under Clause 22 of the agreement dated 28 December 2007.
Whether the arbitration application is maintainable in view of the parties' agreement.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhupendra D. Goradia
M/s. Alfa-e-solutions Pvt. Ltd.
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
