Allowed

Sukhdeo Sambhaji Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC30 Mar 2010APPLN/1476/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving alleged fraudulent sale of land and cheque forgery, directing release on bail subject to personal reporting to the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Granted pre-arrest bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to conditions of reporting to the I.O.

Sukhdeo Sambhaji Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2010)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1476 OF 2010

¶4

Mr. Sukhdeo Sambhaji Shinde...Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.

¶5

Mr.Prakash Naik for the Applicant.

¶6

Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP. for the State.

¶7

CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J.
 DATE : 30th March, 2010

¶8

PC :

¶9

1This is an application for grant of
anticipatory bail. Applicant is shown as an accused
in C.R.No.22/2010 registered by Sangola Police
Station for alleged offences under Section-120-B,
481,419,420,463,465,467,471,472,474 read with 34 of

¶10

the I.P.C. Complaint has been lodged by one Uttam
P. Pawar and according to him land bearing survey
No.166/9/2 from Village Sangola has been
fraudulently sold by fake sellers. One of the sale

¶11

¶12

deed was executed on 22.7.2009. The present
applicant is the pourchaser. It has been found in
the investigation that in the registered sale deed
the photographs of some labourers by names Mr. and
Mrs. Dange have been affixed. Even assuming that
this is so, the present applicant is the real
victim because he has parted monies to the
landlords who are not the real owners. I have
granted anticipatory bail to the other purchasers
from the same land and in the same C.R. In the
circumstances, I am inclined to grant prearrest
bail to the applicant. It is therefore, directed
that in the event of his arrest in C.R.No.22/2010
registered by Sangola Police Station, the applicant
may be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/-
with one surety in the like amount subject to the
condition that he will report to the I.O. between
11.00a.m. to 5.00p.m. on 5.4.2010 and 6.4.2010 and
thereafter as and when called by the Investigating
Officer, in writing. He will remain present on all
the dates of the case in the trial court unless

¶13

¶14

exempted. Application is disposed off.

¶15

2. Parties to act on a copy of this order duly

¶16

authenticated by the registry of this court.

¶17

( R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Sukhdeo Sambhaji Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhdeo Sambhaji Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Riyaz Maqbool Nalband and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra

Dinesh Dattatraya Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ajit Nivruti Nevase and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Suhas @ Haribhau Ashok Talekar and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anandrao Ramchandra Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dilip Dashrath Sawale Vs the State of Maharashtra