The High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to adopt other legal remedies and make representations to the concerned bank. No order as to costs.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt other legal remedies and make representations to the bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.178 OF 2009
Bansidhar Dharamchand Ranka and another Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others
..Petitioners.
..Respondents.
Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioners. Ms. S.M. Dandekar, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. Mable Soans i/b Mable & Associates for Respondent No.8.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
4th March, 2009.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Petitioners wishes to withdraw
this Petition with liberty to adopt such other legal remedy as may be
permissible for him in accordance with law as well as making a representation to the higher authorities of the Punjab National Bank if
necessary. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Bansidhar Dharamchand Ranka
The State of Maharashtra
Svastanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
