This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 189 OF 2009
Arun Nathuram Gaikwad Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others.
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Ms. Sapna i/by M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co. for the petitioner. Ms. A.R. Joshi for the BMC.
Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 3RD MARCH, 2009
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-
Corporation submits that they will look into the allegations made in the
writ petition and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.
survive and the same is disposed of. No order as to costs. The respondents shall abide by the statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Arun Nathuram Gaikwad
State of Maharashtra
BMC
SWANTANter KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
