Uttam Waghmode v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.81 OF 2009
Uttam Waghmode Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and another
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr. Sanjay Patil i/by Mr. P.M. Pradhan for the petitioner. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2009
P.C.
We are of the considered view that the writ of the present
kind is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of this kind is maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Uttam Waghmode
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Swatanter Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs M/S. Rajaram Bapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Sangli
State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs M/S. Rajaram Bapu Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Sangli
Shaikh Ali Mohammed and 29 Ors. Vs M/S. Cordcon Builders Pvt.Ltd. and 3 Ors.
Dr. Cyrus Shapoor Badshah and Anr. Vs Mr. Bomi Pirojshaw Sachinwala