Three writ petitions were found infructuous as an industrial dispute proceeding referred to the Industrial Tribunal had continued, resulting in an award against the petitioners. The High Court disposed of the petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NOS. 228, 229 AND 230 OF 2003
WRIT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2003
| Mr. Sebastiao Araujo Ticro, St. Cruz, Tiswadi-Goa. |
... Petitioner |
|---|---|
| versus | |
| State of Goa and another. | ... Respondents |
| WRIT PETITION NO. 229 OF 2003 | |
| Mr. Manuel Sequeira, Taleigao-Goa. |
... Petitioner |
| versus | |
| State of Goa and another. | ... Respondents |
| WRIT PETITION NO. 230 OF 2003 | |
| Mr. Joao Filomeno Fernandes, Merces-Goa. |
... Petitioner |
| versus | |
| State of Goa and another. | ... Respondents |
2
Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Jimmy John, Advocate for the Petitioners in all the petitions.
Mr. V. Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents in all the petitions.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & N. A. BRITTO, J.
DATE : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
ORAL JUDGMENT(Per SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.)
Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that these petitions have been rendered infructuous.
3. Petitions disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
RD
Sebastiao Araujo Ticro
Manuel Sequeira
Joao Filomeno Fernandes
State of Goa
Swatanter Kumar
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
