Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to dismissal of the underlying suit by the suit court. No order as to costs.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 171 OF 2004
Madrasa Raza e Mustadfa wa Masjid-e-Gousia A-Ahle-Sunnatul Jamat Trust through its Secretary,
Mr. Sayeed Hassan Rizvi Gundar. ... Petitioner
versus
Government of Goa through the Chief Secretary and another. ... Respondents
Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. G. Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J.
DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2009.
P.C.:-
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this petition has
become infructuous. Hence the same is dismissed as infructuous.
It is stated that the suit has been dismissed.
No order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JUDGE
RD
Madrasa Raza e Mustadfa wa Masjid-e-Gousia A-Ahle-Sunnatul Jamat Trust through its Secretary, Mr. Sayeed Hassan Rizvi Gundar
Government of Goa through the Chief Secretary and another
Swatenter Kumar
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
