Petitioner requested court fee concession citing Section 19 of Court Fees Act, 1870. Respondent raised no objection. Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of in favour of petitioner based on fee submission and consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 265 OF 2002
Joao Mariano Fernandes ... Petitioner
versus
State of Goa and another. ... Respondents
Mr. P. Lotlikar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2009.
P.C.:-
Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that he will
pay the Court Fees provided, the reference is made by the Collector in terms of Section 19 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.
To this the learned Advocate General has no objection.
Consequently the petition is disposed of.
Parties to act on that statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JUDGE
RD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Joao Mariano Fernandes
State of Goa
Swatanter Kumar
N. A. Britto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
