PIL writ petitions where petitioners failed to appear today were dismissed for default by the bench.
None. Both PILs dismissed for default due to non-appearance of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 91 OF 2008 IN
PIL NO. 92 OF 2008
.. Dr. Bhoop Singh & Anr. Vs.
The Administrator & Ors. ..
Petitioners.
Respondents
None for the Petitioners in both the petitions.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2009.
P.C.
None was present on the earlier occasion. Today also
when the matter was called out, nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioners. Both the PILs are dismissed for default.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,
J
Dr. Bhoop Singh & Anr.
The Administrator & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
