PIL filed by petitioners was disposed of as infructuous after the State filed an affidavit which conceded that all substantive issues in the petition were resolved, rendering no consideration necessary.
Petition and application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.180 OF 2009
Ansas Abdul Gafoor Khatib & Anr. .. Petitioners
Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.S.R.Borulkar i/b Mr.M.A.Patil for the petitioners
Mr.R.P. Behere, Addl. G.P. for the respondents
CORAM : J. N. Patel & Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, JJ
DATE : September 30, 2009
P.C. :
2
Application No.90 of 2009 does not survive, the same is accordingly disposed of.
( J. N. Patel, J)
(Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J)
Ansas Abdul Gafoor Khatib & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
J. N. Patel
R. P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
