Disposed
Shrikant Rajendra Tiwari v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/130/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.130 OF 2008
Shrikant Rajendra Tiwari.
..Petitioner.
v/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr.A.G.Damle i/b. J.P.Dubey for petitioner.
Mr.R.P.Behere for Addl. G.P.for State.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR,CJ. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED :- SEPTEMBER 24, 2009.
P.C.
the contentions raised by the Petitioner and if the same are found to be correct, steps will be taken by ensuring that the Government property is protected in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by the Counsel appearing for the State, Petition is disposed of. The Respondent
State is abiding by this Statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Shrikant Rajendra Tiwari
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court