In an appeal arising from a writ petition filed under Article 227, the Court dismissed the appeal in default on the ground that no such appeal lies against orders passed under Article 227.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.212 OF 2009 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5303 OF 2008
Shri Jairam Kupuuswamy Mudaliar Versus R.S. Luth Education Trust and others.
... Appellant
... Respondents
None for the appellant.
Mr. Surel S. Shah for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2009
P.C.
Nobody is present on behalf of the appellant. In any case objection
has also been taken about the maintainability of the appeal. For, the petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The learned Single Judge has exercised his power under Article 227 of the Constitution. Therefore, the Letters Patent Appeal does not lie. Dismissed in default.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Letters Patent Appeal lies against an order passed by a Single Judge exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jairam Kupuuswamy Mudaliar
R.S. Luth Education Trust
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
