Dismissed
Shailendra E. Kamble v. State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/56/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.PIL.56-09 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINALSIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.56 OF 2009
Shailendra Eknath Kamble. Versus State of Maharashtra and
3 others.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr.Abhay Pande, Advocate i/b. Ms.Janhavi Lanjekar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.B.H. Mehta, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Mr.Rafiq Dada, Senior Counsel with Mr.P.S. Rao & Mr.Girish Godbole, Advocate i/b.Prakash Mahadik, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
the Charity Commissioner who is holding a quasi-judicial office. The petitioner wants this Court to hold inquiry against him because the petitioner has some grievance against respondent Nos.3 & 4.
Only) are imposed on the petitioner.
[BILAL NAZKI,J.]
[A.R.JOSHI,J.]
Shailendra Eknath Kamble
State of Maharashtra
3 others
BILAL NAZKI
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court