The court dismissed the civil application and appeal for non-prosecution because counsel for the applicant had no instruction to proceed.
Application as well as Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.217 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.6431 OF 2008 WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL(ST.) NO.6431 OF 2008
Muktabai Balu Dhanawade.
..Appliant.
v/s.
Janu Dagdu Dhanawade.
..Respondent.
Mr.Sagar R. Gharat i/b. P.G.Lad for applicant.
CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR,CJ. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED :- SEPTEMBER 2, 2009.
P.C.
instruction. Hence, Application as well as Appeal are dismissed for non-
prosecution.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Muktabai Balu Dhanawade
Janu Dagdu Dhanawade
Swatantekumar
A.M.Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
