Consent terms dated 12th August 2009 were taken on record and the Company Petition stood disposed of in terms of those terms.
Company Petition disposed of in terms of consent terms dated 12th August 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mgj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Company Petition No. 21 of 2009
Rajesh L.Dhanuka ..Petitioner
vs.
Kiran Polyvinayel Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents
Mr.Chetan Agrawal for petitioner
Mr.Bharat Mehta for respondents.
P.C.
1The learned Advocates appearing for
the parties have tendered consent terms dated
12th August, 2009 signed by the petitioner as
well as the respondents. The said consent
terms are taken on record and marked �X� for
identification. The learned Advocates for the
parties have requested the Court to dispose
of the company petition in terms of the
consent terms at X. In view thereof, the
company petition stands disposed of in terms
of the consent terms at X.
Rajesh L. Dhanuka
Kiran Polyvinayel Pvt. Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court