Sulochana Idansingh Nagpal v. M/S. Excel Gas Service
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a contempt petition for want of appearance by the petitioners on multiple adjournment dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.57 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 346 OF 2008.
Sulochna Idansingh Nagpal. ..Petitioner/Applicant (Org.Respondent No.2).
vs.
M/s. Excel Gas Service & Anr. ..Respondents. (Org. Petitioners).
None for Petitioners.
Mr.J.S. Saluja, AGP, for Respondent-State.
CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 11 TH AUGUST 2009.
P.C.
This petition had appeared before this Court on 28th July 2009,
when none appeared for the petitioners. The petition was, therefore,
adjourned to 29th July 2009. On 29th July 2009, none appeared for the petitioners and the petition was once again adjourned to 5th August 2009.
clear that since inception, none has appeared for the petitioners. The
contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed.
[ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]
Sulochna Idansingh Nagpal
M/s. Excel Gas Service
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court