The High Court of Bombay disposed of Company Petition No. 113 of 2009, allowing settlement via consent terms tendered by parties with requisite authorizations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mgj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Company Petition No. 113 of 2009
All India Metal ..Petitioner
vs.
Renaissance Corporation Ltd. .Respondents
Mr.H.V.Chande for petitioner
Mr.Manoj Mhambrey for responents
Mrf.P.M.Chandan, partner of petitioner
present
Mr.Surendra Bhandari, purchase manager of
respondent present.
CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA J.
12th August, 2009
P.C.
1The parties have tendered consent
terms dated 5th August, 2009 signed by the
partner of the petitioners and the authorized
representative of the respondent company as
well as the learned Advocates appearing for
the petitioners and respondents respectively.
The said consent terms are taken on record
and marked �X� for identification. The
learned Advocates appearing for the parties
2
are seeking disposal of the company petition
no.113 of 2009 in terms of the consent terms
at X. Resolution dated 27th July, 2000 passed
by the respondent company authorizing
Mr.Surendra Bhandari to execute the consent
terms is taken on record and marked �X-1� for
identification. Both the signatories to the
consent terms are present in Court. In view
thereof the Company Petition No.113 of 2009
is disposed of in terms of the consent terms
at X.
All India Metal
Renaissance Corporation Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court