The High Court condoned a delay of 91 days in filing Criminal Application No.780 of 2008 under Section 378(3) of CrPC, finding good and sufficient reasons existed.
Criminal Application No.780 of 2008 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Application No.144 of 2008
IN
Criminal Application No.780 of 2008
v/s.
Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for State.
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ.
Dated : 4th August, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard Mrs.Deshmukh, the learned APP. Respondents have been served and none appears for them.2.This is an Application for condonation of delay in filing Criminal Application No.780 of 2008 under Section 378(3) of Criminal Procedure Code. As per the office note, there is a delay of 91 days caused in filing the said Criminal Application No.780 of 2008.3.We are satisfied that good and sufficient reasons have been given to condone the delay and hence, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.][B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 91 days in filing a criminal application for condonation of delay should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Maharashtra
Accused
B.H. Marlapalle
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court