The High Court of Bombay, in this interim order granting personal liberty under Section 439 CrPC, directed the applicant State to take appropriate action against an absconding accused under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No substantive grounds for release were articulated in this brief order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Application No.8 of 2009
IN
Criminal Appeal No.686 of 2007
The State of Mah.....Applicant
(Orig.Complainant)
v/s.
Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, APP for State.
CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ.
Dated : 4th August, 2009
P.C. :
1.We have perused the report submitted by Mrs.Deshmukh,
the learned APP.
2.The Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause
(a). We make it clear that the State will take
appropriate action against the absconding accused under
Sections 82 and 83 of Criminal Procedure Code.
[SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.][B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]
The State of Maharashtra
B.H. Marlappalle
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court