Petitioners sought an injunction against State interference with their properties. Respondents denied allegations. The Court found no need for further orders and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed; no further orders passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 756 OF 2008
DIST.: MUMBAI
Bashir Babu Tambe & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents.
Mr. M.V. Holamagi for the Petitioners Mrs. S.D. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondents.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 28, 2008
P.C. :-
The main relief claimed in this petition is that the respondents should not interfere, disturb or obstruct in the properties of the petitioners and their family members, which is, in fact, in the nature of an injunction. The respondents have filed their affidavit, denying the allegation that they are interfering with the possession of any property of any party. In this view of the matter, we do not think that any further orders are needed to be passed in this petition, which is accordingly dismissed.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.
Bashir Babu Tambe & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
BILAL NAZKI
A.A. KUMBHAKONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
