High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR, ruling it infructuous as investigation was completed and a charge-sheet filed; petitioner must raise pleas below. No legal principle established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1294 OF 2008
DIST.: MUMBAI
Suresh D. Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents.
Mr. N.R. Tiwari for the Petitioner
Mr. A.S. Gadkari, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Respondents.
CORAM : B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 28, 2008
P.C. :-
The First Information Report in C.R. No. 273/PW of 2007 is sought to be quashed. We have been informed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that investigation is completed, and charge-sheet has already been filed. As such, this petition has become infructuous, and is dismissed as such. The petitioner can advance all pleas that may be available to him before the Court below at the time of framing of the charge.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR becomes infructuous upon completion of investigation and filing of charge-sheet.
Suresh D. Singh
The State of Maharashtra
Bilal Nazki
A.A. Kumbhaki
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
