This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
mgj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 4243 of 2008
Mrs. Afroz Khan ..Petitioner
vs.
1. The Commissioner
Mumbai Metropolitan Regional
Development Authority and ors. ..Respondents
Smt.U.A.Marathe for petitioner.
Smt.Kiran Bagalia for respondents.
CORAM:J.N.PATEL &
S.J.KATHAWALLAJJ.
18th November, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks rehabilitation from the
respondents. It will be proper if the petitioner
pursues her case with the respondents. If she is
eligible for rehabilitation the respondents may
consider her case favourably. With this
observation we dismiss the petition.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (J.N.PATEL J.)
Mrs. Afroz Khan
The Commissioner, Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority
J.N. Patel
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court