This court allowed the petitioner to withdraw her writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon grant of leave.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
mgj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 3244 of 2008
Sneha Vilas Nagpure ..Petitioner
vs,.
1. State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents
Shri C.K.Bhanguji i/b Shri R.K.Mendadkar for
petitioner
Shri C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondents.
CORAM:J.N.PATEL &
S.J.KATHAWALLAJJ.
18th November, 2008
P.C.
1. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states
that the petition has become infructuous and,
therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.)(J.N.PATEL J.)
Sneha Vilas Nagpure
State of Maharashtra & ors.
S.J.Kathawalla
J.N.Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court