This PIL petition was held not maintainable and was dismissed. Respondents were directed to furnish any orders passed to the petitioner within one week.
The respondents directed to provide orders, if any, passed by them to the petitioner within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 127 OF 2008
Syed Asgharally Sattarally ..Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. A. D. Bugde for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. S. Masurkar, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND
S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : 23RD OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.
. This Petition is not maintainable as Public
Interest Litigation. The same is dismissed.
2. The Respondents to provide to the petitioner
the orders, if any, passed by them within a period
of one week from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S. A. BOBDE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition filed by the petitioner is maintainable as a Public Interest Litigation?
Syed Asgharally Sattarally
The State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
S. A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court