In a PIL regarding CIDCO, the respondent undertook to examine the matter and pass orders expeditiously. The court accepted this statement, finding nothing surviving, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 95 OF 2008
Navi Mumbai Chamber of Housing Industry Trust ).. Petitioner
Versus
City & Industrial Development and others
).. Respondents
Mr Atul Rajadhyaksha a/w Mr Akhilesh Dubey i/b M. Tripathi & Co. for the Petitioner.
Mr G S Hegde i/b M/s G S Hegde & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr S V Marne for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED: 16TH OCTOBER 2008 .
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 CIDCO submits that they will examine the matter and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in the present Public Interest Litigation and the same is disposed of accordingly. The Respondent will abide by their statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S. A. BOBDE, J.
Navi Mumbai Chamber of Housing Industry Trust
City & Industrial Development Corporation
SWATANTER KUMAR
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
