Dismissed
Sajeda Raees Ahmed and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/113/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 113 OF 2008
Sajeda Raees Ahmed and another
).. Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others
).. Respondents
Mr N R Bubna for the Petitioners. Mr S R Nargolkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMBER 2008 .
P.C.
The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the
State submits that they will look into the averments made in this Writ Petition and after examining the pros and cons would decide the matter in accordance with law and policy of the State expeditiously.
Interest Litigation and the same is disposed of accordingly. No order as
to costs. The Respondents will abide by their statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
-2-
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
Sajeda Raees Ahmed
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court