Public Interest Litigation regarding non-aided polytechnic teachers was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. No order as to costs.
Liberty to file fresh petition if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 111 OF 2008
Teachers Association for Non-Aided Polytechnics and another
)
).. Petitioners
Versus
Government of Maharashtra and others
).. Respondents
Mr S S Pakale for the Petitioners.
Ms Jyoti Pawar, Additional Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 28TH AUGUST 2008 .
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners wishes to
withdraw this Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file fresh Petition if the need so arises.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
Teachers Association for Non-Aided Polytechnics
another
Government of Maharashtra
others
Swatanter Kumar
A. P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
