The appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax was treated by the High Court as discontinued. The department had not appeared, and prior instances of similar non-prosecution suggested lack of intent. The court dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 778 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income tax-11 Nashik ) . ......Appellant
versus
Sandeep S. Lalwani (HUF)........ Respondant.
None for the Appellant.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., &
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED: 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
2
The Commissioner of Income tax-11 Nashik
Sandeep S. Lalwani (HUF)
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
