Petitioners contended against plot usage. Counsel for Municipal Corporation submitted the plot is reserved for recreation, no construction allowed, leaving nothing to survive in the Petition.
Petition disposed of leaving parties to bear their own costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.3265 OF 2004
Lovely Home Co-op HSC. Soc. Ltd. and others
..Petitioners.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. Kalpesh Joshi i/b M/s. M. Ranchoddas & Co. for the Petitioners.
Mr. K.R. Belosey, Government Pleader for Respondents 1 and 3. Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Advocate for the BMC.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
16th August, 2007.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation submits
that the plot in question is reserved for a recreation ground and will be used only for that purpose and no construction will be raised thereon. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in the Petition and the same is disposed of leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Lovely Home Co-op HSC. Soc. Ltd. and others
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
