Disposed

Vainnath Verma v. Ramesh Daryani, and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Aug 2007NMW/101/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition and notice of motion based on consent terms filed by the parties. The consent binds the applicant and specific respondents only, and the court ordered draft amendments to be executed within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and notice of motion disposed of in terms of consent terms; amendments to be carried out within two weeks.

Vainnath Verma Vs Ramesh Daryani, and Ors. — Bombay HC (2007) — LawSathi Research

¶1

 -: 1 :-

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 101 OF 2007

¶5

IN

¶6

 WRIT PETITION NO. 2918 OF 2004

¶7

 WITH

¶8

 WRIT PETITION NO. 2918 OF 2004

¶9

 Vaijnath Verma.... .... .... Applicant.
 Versus
 Ramesh Daryani & Ors.... ... Respondents.

¶10

 Ms. Vaishali Chaudhari for the Applicant.
 Ms.Madhubala Kajle, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
 Mr. A.R.Dhanuka for Respondent No.4.

¶11

CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.

¶12

DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2007.

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

 Learned Counsel appearing for the parties have

¶15

 filed on record the consent terms agreed between the
 applicant / petitioner and respondent nos.4 to 6.
 Along with the terms they have also filed the draft
 amendment. For the purpose of identification
 consented terms are marked "X".

¶16

 2. The writ petition and the notice of motion both
 are disposed of in terms of the consented terms, which

¶17

 -: 2 :-

¶18

 will bind only the petitioner / applicant and
 respondent nos.4 to 6 without affecting the rights of
 respondent nos.1 to 3 in any way.

¶19

 3. It is also stated that during the pendency of the
 proceedings the respondent no.1 has expired and
 respondent no.4 is the legal heir of late respondent
 no.1. The amendments as per the draft amendment
 handed in, be carried out within two weeks from today.

¶20

 Sd/-

¶21

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶22

 Sd/-

¶23

DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.

Vainnath Verma v. Ramesh Daryani, and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vainnath Verma v. Ramesh Daryani, and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Abdul Sattar Haji Gani and 4 Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Jayshree W/O Late Shri Vilas Ramchandra Deo Vs State of Maharshtra and 2 Ors.

Amit Mahendra Gokani Vs State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Chinnubhai Kalidas Patel D/H Sulochana Chinnubhai Patel and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Krishna Y. Parkar Vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

amol ramsing shreshtha Vs the state of maharashtra and 5 Ors.