Appellants sought permission to withdraw an arbitration appeal to move for interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act. The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2007
M/s. Atul Realty Pvt. Ltd. ... Appellants.
V/s.
M/s. Constar Builders and Developers Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondents.
Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Akhilesh Dubey for the Appellants. Mr. V.A. Thorat, Sr. Counsel with Mr. G.S. Godbole and S.S. Kanetkar for Respondent 1.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.
17TH AUGUST 2007.
P.C. :-
. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants
| seek | permission | to | withdraw | the | appeal | since |
the | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appellants | desire | to | move | the | learned | Arbitrator | for | |
| interim | relief | under | Section | 17 | of the |
Arbitration | and |
Conciliation Act, 1996. All the rights and contentions
of the parties are kept open.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Atul Realty Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Constar Builders and Developers Pvt.Ltd.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
