A Public Interest Litigation where the State undertook to treat the petition as a representation for consideration and to pass appropriate orders thereafter. The court disposed of the petition based on the State's undertaking.
The court disposed of the petition based on the State's undertaking to treat it as a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 6 OF 2007
Dilawarkhan Pathan & Ors... ... Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.... Respondents.
Mr.Amin Solkar for the Petitioners.
Ms.Usha Kejriwal, PP for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 16TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel appearing for the State submits
that they will treat the present writ petition as
representation, look into the matter, consider various
aspects and pass such order as may be appropriate in
accordance with law. In view of the statement made,
this petition is disposed of. The respondents would
abide by the statement.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.
Dilawarkhan Pathan & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court