Petition withdrew writ petition transferred under Art. 227; court dismissed it as withdrawn and disposed of attendant notice of motion accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1746 OF 2005 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.194 OF 2005
Smt. Jyotsna Rohekar Vs.
Dr. N. Vijayaditya & Others
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. D.V. Gangal for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Karkera for Respondents 1 to 3.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
10th August, 2007.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw
the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the withdrawal of the Writ Petition, Notice of
Motion 194 of 2005 does not survive and stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Smt. Jyotsna Rohekar
Dr. N. Vijayaditya & Others
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
