Dismissed

Archer Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Feb 2007WP/1230/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, perceiving a possibility of withdrawal under Mardia Chemicals Ltd, sought a withdrawal of the petition. The court permitted withdrawal while allowing the interim relief order to continue for six weeks. The Petition and Chamber Summons were dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order continued for six weeks.

Archer Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

:1:

¶2

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003

¶5

ALONGWITH

¶6

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 393 OF 2006

¶7

IN

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003

¶9

Archer Exports P.Ltd....Petitioners
vs.
Union of India and Ors.....Respondents.

¶10

Mr.G.B.Kedia for the petitioners.

¶11

Mr.D.A.Dubey for respondent no.1.

¶12

Mr.Vinod Kothari i/by.M/s.Apex Law Partners

¶13

for applicant in Ch/s.No.393 of 2006.

¶14

CORAM: J.N.PATEL, J. And

¶15

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.

¶16

DATE ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007.

¶17

P.C :-

¶18

1. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states
that, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court
rendered in Mardia Chemicals Ltd vs. Union of India
and Ors reported in AIR 2004 SC 2371, he seeks to
withdraw the petition and submits that in the mean

¶19

:2:

¶20

time, the ad-interim order granted by this court in
terms of prayer clause (f) may be continued for a
period of six weeks to enable the Petitioner to take
recourse to such remedies available under the
Secrutisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets
and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. We
permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with a
direction that the interim order granted by this
court by the order dated 20.4.2003 shall continue to
be in operation for a period of six weeks. Petition
dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

2.In view of the withdrawal of the Petition
itself, Chamber Summons No. 393 of 2006 does not
survive and the same is disposed off accordingly

Archer Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Archer Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

abdul bari shaikh Vs education inspector and 3 Ors.

Fair View Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika and 4 Ors.

Vijay v. Parulekar Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Podar Mills Ltd. and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Jai Bharat Synthetics Ltd. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kum. Kiran Jaising Sapkal Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.