Disposed
Santosh Pundlik Hargode v. the Administrator, Cidco and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/81/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 81 OF 2007
Santosh P. Hargode.... ... ... Petitioner.
Versus
The Administrator,CIDCO & Ors.. ... Respondents.
Mr.J.N.Pawar for the Petitioner.
Mr. G.S.Hegde for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.1
states that they will look into the complaint made by
respondent no.5 in regard to the transactions of
respondent nos.1 and 4 and pass appropriate order
including the correctness and validity of the licence
dated 1st September, 2006.
2. In view of the statement made, we do not think it
appropriate for this court to keep this petition
pending. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
-: 2 :-
Parties are left to bear their own costs.
3. Enquiry may be concluded expeditiously.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.
Santosh P. Hargode
The Administrator, CIDCO
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court