Civil writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners. No substantive application or hearing was conducted on the merits.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PIL Writ Petition No.41 of 2007
Atmasantulan Villae Pvt Ltd Petitioners.
Vs
Krishnakumar K Kedia & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr S.V. Pitre for the petitioners Mr M.K. Nesari for respondent Nos. 1 to 3
Mr A.A. Kumbhakoni Associate Adv General for Respondent Nos 9 to 11
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J., & SMT RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATE: JULY 18, 2007.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel for the petitioners has placed
on record a letter from the petitioners instructing withdrawal of the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All applications also stand disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
SMT RANJANA DESAI,J.
Atmasantulan Villae Pvt Ltd
Krishnakumar K Kedia
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
