A PIL filed by Anil H. Lalwani was dismissed by the Bombay High Court Bench of CJ Swatanter Kumar and J Ranjana Desai as being infructuous due to the non-appearance of the petitioner, after recording a respondent notification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO.12 OF 2007
Shri Anil H. Lalwani
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Executive Engineer, The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijay Patil for respondent 1.
Mr. P.M. Patil, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED : JULY 18, 2007.
P.C.:-
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have placed on record a copy of the notification issued by the competent authority on 28/5/2007. The writ petition is dismissed as being infructuous.
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
Shri Anil H. Lalwani
The Executive Engineer, The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
