Putative public interest litigation was dismissed for the petitioner's default of appearance. TheCivil Application connected with it was also disposed of with no orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 70 OF 2006 with Civil Application No. 61 of 2006
Ajay Arjun Chavan ... Petitioner
versus
Chief Executive Officer of Slum Redevelopment Authority and and others ... Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. S.G. Surana for the petitioner in Civil Application No. 61/07.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATE: JULY 04, 2007 .
P.C.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. None was
present on 13th June, 2007. Dismissed for default of appearance. In view of the dismissal of the PIL, no orders are required to be passed in the Civil Application and the same is also disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
-2-
SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
Ajay Arjun Chavan
Chief Executive Officer of Slum Redevelopment Authority and others
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
