This is a thin order where the High Court accepted the counsel's submission that the claim should be raised with the MHADA Chief Executive Officer. Consequently, the court held that nothing survived in the Writ Petition and disposed of it.
Writ Petition disposed of; Respondents to abide by order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AJN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.272 OF 2007
Jonita Loyal ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Nilesh B. Pawaskar for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.P. Thorat for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy for the applicants in Chamber Summons No.127 of 2007.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED : JULY 04, 2007.
P.C.:-
AJN
by this order. Writ Petition is disposed of.
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
Jonita Loyal
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
