The High Court of Bombay at Mumbai condoned the delay in filing an appeal by the applicant and made the notice of motion absolute, listing the matter for final disposal at the admission hearing stage.
The Notice of Motion was made absolute and the delay in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3072 OF 2007 IN APPEAL (LDG) NO.681 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2185 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1656 OF 2005
Pankaj K. Gupta. ...Applicant. Vs. Swaran K. Gupta. ...Respondent.
Mr. Sanskar Marathe i/b. M/s. Deven Dwarkadas & Partners for the Applicant.
Mr. Kamal Katha for the Respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. August 22, 2007.
P.C. :
We have heard Learned Counsel. For the reasons stated
in the application, we are satisfied that the delay in filing the present
appeal has been substantially explained. Consequently, the Notice of
Motion is made absolute. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
2
Place the appeal for final disposal at the stage of admission
hearing itself on 19th September 2007.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the present appeal can be substantially explained.
Pankaj K. Gupta
Swaran K. Gupta
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
