The Bombay High Court dismissed the pending appeal and civil application for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant on twice occasions.
Dismissal of the appeal and Civil Application No.488 of 1995 for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET
FIRST APPEAL NO.437 OF 1998
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
.............................................................
Mr.S.R.Singh for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : JANUARY 16,2007.
P.C.:
1. When this Appeal and the Application
were called out in the morning session,
none appeared for the Appellant. Advocate
for the second Respondent was present. On
the second occasion when the Appeal and
the Application are called out, none
appears for the Appellant. Hence, Appeal
as well as Civil Application No.488 of
1995 are dismissed for default.
JUDGE
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court